final argument for Salah Abdeslam’s lawyers




Article written by

N.Perez, E.Pelletier, L.Simondet, F.Daireaux, R.Gardeux, E.De Pourquery, France 3 île-de-France, P.-M. of the Foata – France 3

France Televisions

The trial of the terrorist attacks 13-November coming to an end. The verdict is expected Wednesday, June 29. Friday, June 24, was the last day of argument for the defense, with that of Salah Abdeslam’s lawyers.

It’s been nine months that their client provokes, exceeds the victims and sometimes the court. Friday, June 24, during the trial of the attacks of 13-NovemberSalah Abdeslam’s lawyers had only one goal for the last day of defense pleadings: to avoid an incompressible life sentence, that is to say, life imprisonment with practically no chance of getting out of it one day.

A verdict expected for Wednesday, June 29

In his defence, it is first and foremost a matter of principle. The penalty of incompressibility is a terrible penalty, unlike capital punishment, this white death is lived in indifference“, said Olivia Ronenlawyer for Salah Abdeslam. According to his defenders, Salah Abdeslam should not be judged in place of the suicide bombers. He is not the main perpetrator, he insists, because he would have given up detonating his belt so as not to kill people, “out of humanity” according to his words. An argument still not very credible for the victims. The verdict is expected for Wednesday, June 29.

Leave a Comment